Search for: All records

The current technologies to place new DNA into specific locations in plant genomes are low frequency and error-prone, and this inefficiency hampers genome-editing approaches to develop improved crops. Often considered to be genome ‘parasites’, transposable elements (TEs) evolved to insert their DNA seamlessly into genomes. Eukaryotic TEs select their site of insertion based on preferences for chromatin contexts, which differ for each TE type. Here we developed a genome engineering tool that controls the TE insertion site and cargo delivered, taking advantage of the natural ability of the TE to precisely excise and insert into the genome. Inspired by CRISPR-associated transposases that target transposition in a programmable manner in bacteria, we fused the rice Pong transposase protein to the Cas9 or Cas12a programmable nucleases. We demonstrated sequence-specific targeted insertion (guided by the CRISPR gRNA) of enhancer elements, an open reading frame and a gene expression cassette into the genome of the model plant Arabidopsis. We then translated this system into soybean—a major global crop in need of targeted insertion technology. We have engineered a TE ‘parasite’ into a usable and accessible toolkit that enables the sequence-specific targeting of custom DNA into plant genomes. 

The plant-specific RNA Polymerase V (Pol V) plays a key role in gene silencing, but its role in repair of double stranded DNA breaks is unclear. Excision of the transposable element mPing creates double stranded breaks that are repaired by NHEJ. We measured mPing excision site repair in multiple DNA methylation mutants including pol V using an mPing : GFP reporter. Two independent mutant alleles of pol V showed less GFP expression, indicating that the Pol V protein plays a role in excision site repair. Sequence analysis of the pol V excision sites indicated an elevated rate of large deletions consistent with less efficient repair. These results clarify the role of Pol V, but not other RNA-directed DNA methylation proteins (Pol IV) or maintenance DNA methylation pathways ( MET1 ), in the repair of double-strand DNA breaks. 

The plant-specific RNA Polymerase V (Pol V) plays a key role in gene silencing, but its role in repair of double stranded DNA breaks is unclear. Excision of the transposable element mPing creates double stranded breaks that are repaired by NHEJ. We measured mPing excision site repair in multiple DNA methylation mutants including pol V using an mPing:GFP reporter. Two independent mutant alleles of pol V showed less GFP expression, indicating that the Pol V protein plays a role in excision site repair. Sequence analysis of the pol V excision sites indicated an elevated rate of large deletions consistent with less efficient repair. These results clarify the role of Pol V, but not other RNA-directed DNA methylation proteins (Pol IV) or maintenance DNA methylation pathways (MET1), in the repair of double-strand DNA breaks. 

Abstract BackgroundDNA transposable elements are mobilized by a “cut and paste” mechanism catalyzed by the binding of one or more transposase proteins to terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) to form a transpositional complex. Study of the rice genome indicates that themPingelement has experienced a recent burst in transposition compared to the closely relatedPingandPongelements. A previously developed yeast transposition assay allowed us to probe the role of both internal and terminal sequences in the mobilization of these elements. ResultsWe observed thatmPingand a syntheticmPongelement have significantly higher transposition efficiency than the related autonomousPingandPongelements. Systematic mutation of the internal sequences of bothmPingandmPongidentified multiple regions that promote or inhibit transposition. Simultaneous alteration of single bases on bothmPingTIRs resulted in a significant reduction in transposition frequency, indicating that each base plays a role in efficient transposase binding. Testing chimericmPingandmPongelements verified the important role of both the TIRs and internal regulatory regions.Previous experiments showed that the G at position 16, adjacent to the 5′ TIR, allows mPingto have higher mobility. Alteration of the 16th and 17th base frommPing’s3′ end or replacement of the 3′ end withPong3′ sequences significantly increased transposition frequency. ConclusionsAs the transposase proteins were consistent throughout this study, we conclude that the observed transposition differences are due to the element sequences. The presence of sub-optimal internal regions and TIR bases supports a model in which transposable elements self-limit their activity to prevent host damage and detection by host regulatory mechanisms. Knowing the role of the TIRs, adjacent sub-TIRs, and internal regulatory sequences allows for the creation of hyperactive elements. 

Introduction: Class II DNA transposable elements account for significant portions of eukaryotic genomes and contribute to genome evolution through their mobilization. To escape inactivating mutations and persist in the host genome over evolutionary time, these elements must be mobilized enough to result in additional copies. These elements utilize a “cut and paste” transposition mechanism that does not intrinsically include replication. However, elements such as the rice derived mPing element have been observed to increase in copy number over time. Methods: We used yeast transposition assays to test several parameters that could affect the excision and insertion of mPing and its related elements. This included development of novel strategies for measuring element insertion and sequencing insertion sites. Results: Increased transposase protein expression increased the mobilization frequency of a small (430 bp) element, while overexpression inhibition was observed for a larger (7,126 bp) element. Smaller element size increased both the frequency of excision and insertion of these elements. The effect of yeast ploidy on element excision, insertion, and copy number provided evidence that homology dependent repair allows for replicative transposition. These elements were found to preferentially insert into yeast rDNA repeat sequences. Discussion: Identifying the parameters that influence transposition of these elements will facilitate their use for gene discovery and genome editing. These insights in to the behavior of these elements also provide important clues into how class II transposable elements have shaped eukaryotic genomes. 

Class II DNA Transposable Elements (TEs) are moved from one location to another in the genome by the action of transposase proteins that bind to repeat sequences at the ends of the elements. Although the location TE insertion is mostly random, the addition of DNA binding domains to the transposase proteins has allowed for targeted insertion of some elements. In this study, the Gal4 binding domain was added to the transposase proteins, ORF1 and TPase, which mobilize the mPing element from rice. The Gal4:TPase construct was capable of increasing the number of mPing insertions into the Gal2 and Gal4 promoter sequences in yeast. While this confirms that mPing insertion preference can be manipulated, the target specificity is relatively low. Thus, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was tested for its ability to generate targeted insertion of mPing. A dCas9:TPase fusion protein had a low transposition rate suggesting that the addition of this large protein disrupts TPase function. Unfortunately, the use of a MS2 binding domain to localize the TPase to the MS2 hairpin containing gRNA failed to produce targeted insertion. Thus, our results suggest that the addition of small DNA binding domain to the N-terminal of TPase is the best strategy for targeted insertion of mPing. 

Abstract Modern plant breeding increasingly relies on genomic information to guide crop improvement. Although some genes are characterized, additional tools are needed to effectively identify and characterize genes associated with crop traits. To address this need, themPingelement from rice was modified to serve as an activation tag to induce expression of nearby genes. Embedding promoter sequences inmPingresulted in a decrease in overall transposition rate; however, this effect was negated by using a hyperactive version ofmPingcalledmmPing20. Transgenic soybean events carryingmPing‐based activation tags and the appropriate transposase expression cassettes showed evidence of transposition. Expression analysis of a line that contained a heritable insertion of themmPing20Factivation tag indicated that the activation tag induced overexpression of the nearby soybean genes. This represents a significant advance in gene discovery technology as activation tags have the potential to induce more phenotypes than the originalmPingelement, improving the overall effectiveness of the mutagenesis system.